Peace is not war

Which one is you? 

Perspective 1

Putin is an evil psychopath that must be stopped by all means. This one you all know, it's what we hear all day long. 

Perspective 2

We should be aware of the context and history of all this. NATO with its bases, biolabs, and expansions, increasingly became a security threat at the Russia's borders. In 2014 US backed a coup in Ukraine with the help of US radicalized and trained neo-nazis on the Al Qaeda model. In the last 8 years the puppet regime and their US backed thugs daily bombed the Russian speaking Ukrainians in Donbas, killed 14000, did the Odessa massacre, and in general installed a nationalist terror there. 

In this perspective many people tend to support Russia, on the model "being against war in my book means supporting those who challenge Western global hegemony." This is the perspective of some alternative media, and of many non western populations that have suffered at one point or another at the hands of US or NATO, and their hundreds of invasions, coups, chaos and misery creating operations. They tend to see US and NATO as evil and their challengers if not as heroes, at least as lesser evils. And they point out the hypocrisy of the most people in the West who seem to care only for the invasions and bombings that media tell them to care. 

Perspective 3

People are still naively thinking in nations terms. Brzezinski (advisor to Kennedy, Johnson and Jimmy Carter) already in 1970 was saying: “The nation-state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multi-national corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state. … This elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behaviour and keeping society under close surveillance and control.”

Real power is suprademocratic and supranational, held by entities that no one votes for. Governments, including those of the US, Russia and China, simply implement local policies for what WEF calls the interconnected web of global stakeholders and the diffuse network of public-private partnerships. The way how behavioral experts, and entire media seamlessly shifted their show machine from covid to war, points towards their powers of shaping reality, at least at the level of perception.  

This war can be a transition from western hegemony towards a Eurasian led multipolar system. Or maybe they just needed another show because people started to catch up with the covid and "vaccine" lies. The war is also perfect to blame for the consequences of their pandemic measures and operations, like "printing" massive amounts of money that went in their pockets leading to the current hyperinflation and economic crisis. And probably the war will further enable the great reset, and the installation of their fascist technocracy.

Any attempt to talk about these suprademocratic zones of power is "conspiracy theory", and is made to be socially unacceptable, and scary. "Conspiracy theory", according to M.C. Miller is: “something that if true, you couldn’t handle it.” But during the "pandemic" "conspiracy theory" started to also mean, more and more, "corruption investigation". People started to assume the term, like in the first line of Conspirationniste Manifesto (book by the famous Invisible Committee) - "We are conspiracy theorists, like all sensible people today."

Perspective 4

No to War! The war must be stopped by all non war means. Caitlin Johnstone: "Wars end in one of two ways: with diplomacy and negotiation, or with mountains of corpses. If you're opposed to any kind of negotiation with Moscow to bring about peace, then you want the latter. And if you do, you should get your bitch ass on a plane and join the front lines. … I'd like to see a poll asking Ukrainian mothers the question, 'Would you sacrifice your son for the remote possibility of future NATO/EU membership and control over Crimea and the Donbas?' Because those have been the conditions for ending this war for over a week. … Pouring more weapons into Ukraine is not how you save lives; you save lives by negotiating a ceasefire. Pouring more weapons into Ukraine is how you create a long and expensive military quagmire for Russia at the cost of many thousands of lives to advance US strategic interests. While making a vast fortune for the arms industry. Issuing a guarantee that you would never add a nation to NATO who you don't plan on adding anyway is a no-brainer when the alternative is mass military butchery. I mean, unless your goal was to provoke mass military butchery.”

We shouldn't allow propaganda to convince us that any form of war is necessary or good. It's not worth pushing for a radioactive WW3 just because some elites don't want to lose at their geopolitical games, played with our lives. This is especially so, when, before the western intervention and lsraeli intelligence collaboration with Ukraine to develop a Russia phobic sentiment, Ukrainians were pro Russia and against EU integration. Why not the western and eastern oligarchs, and their political representatives, fight each other and leave people alone. We shouldn't care about their stupid power games. The urgency is to stop the fanatical war frenzy that is installed in us by the spectacle machine. They want to make us ask for war escalation. We actually want an escalation of peace.

Spectacle must go on